The College’s integrated planning and budgeting process is designed to collect input from all levels of the College. It starts at the program, unit, or area level when faculty and staff are encouraged to review and evaluate data metrics and other assessment information for their respective areas. Faculty and staff are encouraged to collaborate on an analysis and evaluation of the data in order to make recommendations for improvements including the need for any additional resources. Resource Request Lists are reviewed and prioritized at varying levels until a final institutional resource priority list is developed and recommended to the Chancellor who approves and then shares the resource priority list at convocation.
The driver of the planning and budgeting process is the College mission and strategic plan. The University of Hawai‘i Community College (UHCC) system developed the Annual Report of Program Data (ARPD), a requirement for programs and support areas, to meet the University of Hawai`i (UH) Board of Regents (BOR) and UH system policies on program review. Since this process is mandatory, Leeward’s planning process utilizes the ARPD as the central planning document for the campus.
In addition to the ARPD, a Comprehensive Review and Evaluation (CRE) document is required every five years, per UH BOR and UH system policies on program review. The CRE template incorporates information from the ARPDs, to provide a big picture analysis for programs and units.
Institutional Priorities
As part of the planning process, all programs, divisions, units, and areas develop Resource Requests based on the results of their assessments and program reviews. These resource requests are prioritized within the four main areas of the college: Instruction, Student Services, Academic Services, and Administrative Services. Each area prioritizes the resource requests submitted from their respective units and departments.
The Administrative Team (i.e., Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, Vice Chancellor of Administrative Services, Dean of Arts and Sciences, Dean of Career and Technical Education, Dean of Student Services, and Dean of Academic Services) combines all of the resource requests and creates draft Institutional Priorities for the campus. These priorities are shared with the College's governance groups: Student Government, Pūkoʻa no Nā ʻEwa Council, Campus Council and Faculty Senate. These bodies are responsible for sharing the Institutional Priorities with their constituents and gathering feedback on the recommended priorities. Campus Council provides a final recommendation on the Institutional Priorities to the Chancellor. A comprehensive Operational Expenditure Plan is developed for the following academic year using the Institutional Priorities as a guide for allocating available funds (for more information see the Administrative Services Budget Information website).
Planning Process General Timeline
ACTIVITY | TIME FRAME |
---|---|
Planning Process Guidelines and Tools Distributed by OPPA and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs (VCAA)
|
September 15 |
Programs and Units Work on ARPDs & CREs
|
September 15-November 29 |
ARPDs & CREs Completed
|
November 30 |
Instructional and Support Areas Prioritize Resource Request Lists
|
December 1-January 31 |
Draft Institutional Priorities
|
February 1-15 |
Administration Meets with Executives of Governance Groups to Discuss Rationale for Draft Institutional Priorities
|
February 16-23 |
Governance Group Executives Share Draft Institutional Priorities List with Constituents, Collect Feedback, and Share Feedback with Administration
|
February 24-March 10 |
Administration Reviews Feedback from Governance Groups and Revises Draft Institutional Priorities
|
March 11-31 |
Governance Groups Review & Vote on Draft Institutional Priorities List
|
April 1-April Meeting |
Campus Council Approves Institutional Priorities List
|
May Meeting |
Chancellor Reviews Institutional Priorities List
|
May 15-Start of the New Academic Year |
Budget Decisions and Details Communicated
|
Fall Convocation |